Commentary by Fr. C. Daniels
Why these fantastic public lies? It is not my intention to conjecture into the maze of lies and intrigue, but, it seems clear enough that from within the Vatican there are elements who seek only our destruction. How to go about it? It's an old tale; "divide so to conquer."
While it is true that Cardinal Hoyos is preparing to celebrate a public Tridintine Mass on the 24th of May in St. Mary Majors, in Rome, it is also absolutely false that the Society of St. Pius X is planning to participate, and even less still, to make of it an "event of reconciliation."
It would seem that there are elements in the Vatican who are trying to use this event to kill two birds with one stone. They hate Cardinal Hoyos and his work, whom they consider as a traditionalist (although we look at him as a liberal), and they hate the Society of St. Pius X. So, why not drum-up this story so as to prevent the Cardinal from celebrating the Tridintine Mass publically (a first time since the New Mass appeared for a Cardinal to do so publically in the heart of Rome) and to ferment discord within the Society of St. Pius X. For what other reason would they seek to proclaim that only three of the four bishops are to participate at the "reconciliation", and that Bishop Williamson is now the leader of the fanatics?
Although it is hard to pin-point the whole mind set or strategy of the enemy, it is not hard to see that this diabolical clement both fears the Society and seeks thus to divide us.
Dear friends, I give
you below the whole text as it appeared on the "Times" website,
as well as the statement of both the Superior General and Bishop Tissier
de Mallerais. For the rest, I think your common sense will show you its
from the TIMES
woos conservatives expelled for rebellion
THE Pope is to heal a breach with rebel arch-conservatives in the Roman Catholic Church by reinstating excommunicated followers of the late Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, who broke with Rome in 1988 to protest against the reforms of the Second Vatican Council, including the abolition of the Latin Mass.
The schism had caused the Pope much anguish, Vatican sources said. By bringing the more “moderate schismatics” back into the fold he hoped to isolate extreme followers of Dr Lefebvre and close the matter, as one of the last acts of reconciliation in his pontificate.
The Rome daily newspaper Il Messaggero said that this would mark a victory for the Pope in the battle for the “soul of the Church”, which had been going on since Vatican II in the 1960s.
Dr Lefebvre condemned
the council’s reforms as “Marxist” and “neo-Protestant”.
He demanded traditional Masses in Latin, frequent confession and an emphasis
on the realities of Hell as a punishment for mortal sin.
The order, which was issued on behalf of the Pope by Cardinal Bernardin Gantin of Benin, the Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops at the time, declared that Dr Lefebvre and the bishops had “incurred ipso facto excommunication”, the penalty envisaged by Canon Law. He said that those who supported “the schism of Monsignor Lefebvre” would also incur “the very grave penalty of excommunication”.
Until his death in 1991 Dr Lefebvre, who had served as a bishop in Gabon and Dakar, before becoming Archbishop of Tulle in his native France in 1962, continued to voice hardline opposition to church “liberalism”.
The Pope’s reconciliatory moves are being resisted by a group of arch-traditionalists led by the British-born Bishop Richard Williamson, one of the four prelates ordained by Dr Lefebvre.
Bishop Williamson has said that the Vatican has “sold its soul to liberalism”. He said recently that the gulf between the traditionalists and the Pope was unbridgeable, and that the Pope had a “weak grasp of Catholicism”.
The readmission to the Church of the three other bishops who were ordained by Dr Lefebvre — Bernard Fellay of Switzerland, Bernard Tissier of France and Alfonso de Gallareta of Argentina — is to be announced next month at a Mass at the Basilica of St Mary Major in Rome, conducted by Cardinal Dario Castrillon Hoyos of Colombia, head of the Congregation for the Clergy. The Cardinal is seen by many as a credible Latin American candidate to be the next Pope.
Vatican sources said that Cardinal Castrillon Hoyos, 75, had begun secret negotiations in the Vatican more than two years ago with the moderate wing of the schismatics, led by Bishop Fellay. The talks had had the Pope’s blessing.
The Corriere della Sera newspaper said that, in a gesture to the returning “prodigal sons”, Cardinal Castrillon Hoyos would hold the Mass in Latin, the first time that a Latin Mass had been said in one of the main Rome basilicas for more than 30 years.
It appears that the ordination of the bishops will be recognised in retrospect as part of their readmission to the fold. It is not clear how many of the 400 priests who also joined the Lefebvre movement — known as the Society of St Pius X — will follow suit. The society, which Dr Lefebvre founded in 1969 to fight the Vatican, has an estimated 150,000 followers, who will have to decide whether to rejoin the mainstream.
Despite the concession of the Latin Mass, the returning bishops will have to swear loyalty not only to the Pope but also to the conclusions of Vatican II. Dr Lefebvre said that the council had “destroyed the Church, ruined the priesthood and abolished the sacrifice of the Mass and the sacraments”.
There is a provision by Vatican II, reinforced by the Pope, for the Latin — or Tridentine — Mass to be said by special dispensation. It remains the exception rather than the rule.Dr Lefebvre’s denunciations of what he called the neo-modernism and neo-Protestantism of Vatican II had brought him into repeated conflict with Pope Paul VI, who in 1976 forbade him to say Mass.
The move by the present Pope is in part a gamble aimed at showing that many of Dr Lefebvre’s followers are willing to refuse to compromise and stay out in the cold. A hard core holds that the seat of St Peter is vacant, since they do not recognise the election of John Paul II.
More moderate Lefebvrists, however, increasingly find this absurd, especially since the Pope has himself adopted sternly conservative measures in the twilight of his pontificate. Last week he reminded Catholics of the strict rules governing Communion — including the ban on joint Communion with Protestants — and last year he said that the trend among Catholic liberals towards mass absolution instead of individual confession was unacceptable.
Statement by Bishop Bernard Fellay
Le Messagero has publicized a so-called reconciliattion of three bishops of the Society of St. Pius X with rome. This is supposed to be done at the celebration of a mass in the Tridintine rite by His Eminence, Cardinal Hoyos on the 24th of May in the Roman basilica of St. Mary Majors.
Mgr. Bernard Bellay, Superior general of the Society of St. Pius X knows nothing of such , and guarantees that the four bishops, and not only three, are entirely united in their unchanged position in the defense of Catholic tradition in the line of His Excellency, Mgr. Marcel Lefebvre.
Menzingen, 22 April
The French Ordinal: The above translation by the editor: Il Messaggero a répandu la nouvelle d'une prétendue réconciliation de trois évêques de la Fraternitêé saccrdolalc St Pie X avec Rome. Celle-ci devrail être annoncée à l'occasion de la célebration de la messe scion le rite tridentin par SE le Cardinal Hoyos le 24 mai prochain dans la basilique romaine de Santa Maria Maggiore.
Mgr Bernard Fellay, Supérieur général de la Fraternité St Pie X, n'est pas an courant d'une telle histoire et assure que les quatrc évêques et non seulement trois soul bien unis dans leur position inchangée pour la défense de la Tradition catholique dans la lignée de SF Mgr Marcel Lefebvre.
by Bishop Tissier de Mallerais